With the recent legalization of adult-use cannabis in Ohio, there are important implications for probable cause determinations in legal cases, particularly regarding warrantless vehicle searches. Historically, the scent of marijuana was often sufficient grounds for police to conduct such searches under the "automobile exception" to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. However, evolving marijuana laws challenge this approach.
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Traditionally, courts have allowed police to search vehicles without a warrant if probable cause exists that contraband is inside. Before marijuana legalization, one primary indicator was the "plain smell" test—if an officer detected the odor of marijuana, they could conduct a search.
In Ohio, this principle was firmly established in State v. Moore, 90 Ohio St.3d 47 (2000), where the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that “the smell of burnt marijuana, alone, by a person qualified to recognize the odor, is sufficient to establish probable cause to search a motor vehicle, pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement.” This was a standard approach before any marijuana use was legal in the state.
However, the legalization of medical marijuana in 2016 and hemp in 2019 led to modifications of the rule. In State v. Oliver, 2023-Ohio-1550, Ohio’s Tenth District Court of Appeals held that the smell of raw marijuana alone is no longer sufficient to establish probable cause. The Court reasoned that with legal and illegal marijuana coexisting, it is impossible to discern legality based solely on odor.
New Ohio Marijuana Laws
Ohio's new marijuana law, the Act to Control and Regulate Adult Use Cannabis, passed in November 2023 and went into effect in December 2023. This law allows Ohio residents aged 21 and over to possess and consume up to 2.5 ounces of cannabis, grow up to six plants for personal use, and purchase cannabis from licensed dispensaries. However, there are several prohibitions, including public consumption and operating vehicles under the influence.
The big question now is how this new law will affect probable cause. While Ohio courts may still consider the odor of marijuana as a factor, it will likely be balanced alongside the totality of circumstances.
How Other States Handle Marijuana and Probable Cause
Several states that have already legalized marijuana offer insight into how Ohio courts may adapt. For example:
- Virginia: In 2020, Virginia passed a statute prohibiting law enforcement from stopping or searching a person or vehicle solely based on the odor of marijuana.
- New York: New York law restricts searches based on cannabis odor, particularly in areas of a vehicle not accessible to the driver or likely to contain evidence of illegal activity.
- Maryland: Maryland prohibits searches based solely on the smell of marijuana or the presence of small, legal amounts of the drug, adopting a totality of the circumstances approach.
- Colorado: Despite legalizing marijuana, Colorado courts consider the odor of marijuana in determining probable cause, but as part of a broader set of factors.
- Illinois: Most recently, the Illinois Supreme Court held in People v. Redmond that while the odor of burnt cannabis can be considered, it cannot independently establish probable cause.
As Ohio navigates this new legal territory, it is still unclear exactly how courts will manage marijuana-related probable cause issues. However, it is expected that law enforcement and courts will continue to adopt a more nuanced approach, considering the odor alongside other factors to decide whether a search is justified.
Psychosis and the Dangers of Marijuana Legalization
Despite the increase in legalization of marijuana in states across the country, including Ohio, it is important to recognize the potential dangers of the drug. Studies have shown that regular or high-potency marijuana use can increase the risk of developing severe episodes of psychosis, including hallucinations and delusions. These episodes can be especially troubling for individuals predisposed to mental health disorders.
Additionally, marijuana today is significantly more potent than the marijuana of earlier decades. THC, the psychoactive part in marijuana, is now present in much higher concentrations than in the past. This increased potency can lead to more intense side effects and a higher risk of adverse outcomes, such as anxiety, paranoia, or psychosis.
Unlike alcohol, where consumers can easily gauge how much they are ingesting from a standard drink – like a can of beer with a clearly labeled alcohol content – THC intake is far less straightforward. The THC content in THC products can vary widely, and many users do not fully understand how much they are consuming, especially when it comes to edibles or concentrated forms such as oils or dabs.
Disclaimer: The information in this blog post is provided for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from the Tyack Law Firm Co., L.P.A., or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel or representation on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country, county, or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction.
Talk with an experienced Lawyer today
Fill out the form to get started with your case evaluation.
